당신은 주제를 찾고 있습니까 “asus zenbook 14 um425ia-am006t opiniones – Đánh giá ASUS ZenBook 14 UM425IA – Thiết kế đẹp, mỏng, nhẹ, cấu hình mạnh, RẤT ĐÁNG TIỀN“? 다음 카테고리의 웹사이트 th.taphoamini.com 에서 귀하의 모든 질문에 답변해 드립니다: https://th.taphoamini.com/wiki/. 바로 아래에서 답을 찾을 수 있습니다. 작성자 Dương Dê 이(가) 작성한 기사에는 조회수 7,426회 및 좋아요 159개 개의 좋아요가 있습니다.
Table of Contents
asus zenbook 14 um425ia-am006t opiniones 주제에 대한 동영상 보기
여기에서 이 주제에 대한 비디오를 시청하십시오. 주의 깊게 살펴보고 읽고 있는 내용에 대한 피드백을 제공하세요!
d여기에서 Đánh giá ASUS ZenBook 14 UM425IA – Thiết kế đẹp, mỏng, nhẹ, cấu hình mạnh, RẤT ĐÁNG TIỀN – asus zenbook 14 um425ia-am006t opiniones 주제에 대한 세부정보를 참조하세요
Dương Dê – Đánh giá các sản phẩm điện thoại và đồ công nghệ Fanpage: https://www.facebook.com/DuongDeOfficial/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/DuongDeOfficial/
Facebook cá nhân: https://www.facebook.com/truongngocduong10v0
asus zenbook 14 um425ia-am006t opiniones 주제에 대한 자세한 내용은 여기를 참조하세요.
ASUS ZenBook 14 … – Amazon.es:Opiniones de clientes
Vea reseñas y calificaciones de reseñas que otros clientes han escrito de ASUS ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T – Portátil Full HD (Ryzen 7 4700U, 16GB RAM, …
Source: www.amazon.es
Date Published: 4/9/2022
View: 4995
▷ ASUS Zenbook UM425IA-AM006T | Test, Review y Mejor Precio
Comprar ASUS Zenbook UM425IA-AM006T es una magnífica ea si buscas un portátil ultra ligero con una potencia nada desdeñable.
Source: gangasamazing.com
Date Published: 2/25/2022
View: 7308
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T – NotebookCheck.net
Reviews for the Asus ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T … Positive: Compact size; light weight; powerful processor; nice webcam; great connectivity. Negative: No numeric …
Source: www.notebookcheck.net
Date Published: 12/3/2022
View: 7765
Asus Zenbook 14 UM425IA-AM006T AMD Ryzen 7 4700U …
Opiniones, comentarios y reseñas sobre Asus Zenbook 14 UM425IA-AM006T AMD Ryzen 7 4700U/16GB/512GB SSD/14″ de nuestros clientes y usuarios.
Source: www.pccomponentes.com
Date Published: 3/11/2021
View: 3104
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425 review (UM425IA – AMD Ryzen 7 …
It’s made well and feels premium, it’s compact and portable, it doesn’t compromise on inputs, IO, or screen quality, it performs well with daily …
Source: www.ultrabookreview.com
Date Published: 8/1/2022
View: 2754
ASUS ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T: Precio, opiniones y …
ASUS ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T | 14″ | IPS | 1920×1080 | 4700U | 2GHz | 16GB | 512GB SSD | Windows 10 Home.
Source: kelaptop.com
Date Published: 4/15/2022
View: 5339
ASUS ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T Opiniones y Review
Pasamos a lo que nos interesa, nuestra opinión del rendimiento del ordenador portátil ASUS ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T, el cuál no va a dejar indiferente a …
Source: portatilesgaming.es
Date Published: 8/11/2022
View: 2596
Zenbook 14 UM425 – ASUS
The Asus UM425IA-AM006T ultraportable is easily distinguishable by the marvellous … Veo reviews. The ASUS ZenBook 14 UM425IA is a long-lasting notebook.
Source: www.asus.com
Date Published: 4/2/2022
View: 424
Asus Zenbook 14 UM425IA-AM006 | Análisis del 14
Mira en nuestro análisis y opiniones el Asus Zenbook 14 UM425IA-AM006 ☑️, un portátil de 14 pulgadas premium con AMD Ryzen 7 4700U y ErgoLift.
Source: www.lobaratosalecaro.com
Date Published: 12/26/2021
View: 2028
주제와 관련된 이미지 asus zenbook 14 um425ia-am006t opiniones
주제와 관련된 더 많은 사진을 참조하십시오 Đánh giá ASUS ZenBook 14 UM425IA – Thiết kế đẹp, mỏng, nhẹ, cấu hình mạnh, RẤT ĐÁNG TIỀN. 댓글에서 더 많은 관련 이미지를 보거나 필요한 경우 더 많은 관련 기사를 볼 수 있습니다.
주제에 대한 기사 평가 asus zenbook 14 um425ia-am006t opiniones
- Author: Dương Dê
- Views: 조회수 7,426회
- Likes: 좋아요 159개
- Date Published: 2021. 1. 1.
- Video Url link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wdMWqtCC3Q
Portátil Full HD (Ryzen 7 4700U, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD, Radeon Graphics, Windows 10 Home) Gris Pino
El Portátil está bien acabado, los materiales son buenos, el teclado está bien, la iluminación de mismo, también.
El sonido es suficiente.
La cámara,es un desastre, todas son malas, pero esta es peor.
He hecho una transferencia de archivos ,y está por debajo de la media.
El procesador es bastante ágil y solvente.
La pantalla………..menuda decepción.
1°Ni tiene 400 Nits,cómo anuncia, yo diría a ojo que tiene 220 aproximadamente.
2°La calidad de colores no es del 72%Ntsc ni 100%RGB,ni se le acercan, aporto fotos comparativas de un Lenovo Yoga 920.
Estamos hablando de 900€,yo creo que Asus se debería esforzarse más, para obtener a cambio de mi dinero ,un portátil con una pantalla que estuviera a la altura.
Creo que todas las Revisiones que he encontrado en Yutube, no dicen o no están siendo objetivos con éste portátil.
Creo sinceramente, que dicen lo lo políticamente correcto, y no quiero pensar que no sepan distinguir un monitor o pantalla de cierta calidad.
En este caso ha había una falta de contraste y un tono azulado, que molestaba mucho a la vista.
En fin, pantalla es bastante mediocre.
Yo no pagararia más de 550€,por éste portátil con las prestaciones que tiene.
Y aún y todo es dinero 💰.
Creo que lo de los nits sólo éste modelo”Um 425IA” monta la pantalla de 250 nits y de ésta calidad ,que es precisamente el el que monta el procesador Ryzen 7 4700.
Estas cosas las debería de especificar el
Vendedor.
Tengo entendido que el modelo Ux 425,que montan Intel, la pantalla es de 400 Nits.
En fin,el producto no coincide con lo que compramos.
3,0 de 5 estrellas Mala calidad de pantalla .
Por HECTOR FERNANDEZ OLIVAN el 22 de mayo de 2021 El Portátil está bien acabado, los materiales son buenos, el teclado está bien, la iluminación de mismo, también.
El sonido es suficiente.
La cámara,es un desastre, todas son malas, pero esta es peor.
He hecho una transferencia de archivos ,y está por debajo de la media.
El procesador es bastante ágil y solvente.
La pantalla………..menuda decepción.
1°Ni tiene 400 Nits,cómo anuncia, yo diría a ojo que tiene 220 aproximadamente.
2°La calidad de colores no es del 72%Ntsc ni 100%RGB,ni se le acercan, aporto fotos comparativas de un Lenovo Yoga 920.
Estamos hablando de 900€,yo creo que Asus se debería esforzarse más, para obtener a cambio de mi dinero ,un portátil con una pantalla que estuviera a la altura.
Creo que todas las Revisiones que he encontrado en Yutube, no dicen o no están siendo objetivos con éste portátil.
Creo sinceramente, que dicen lo lo políticamente correcto, y no quiero pensar que no sepan distinguir un monitor o pantalla de cierta calidad.
En este caso ha había una falta de contraste y un tono azulado, que molestaba mucho a la vista.
En fin, pantalla es bastante mediocre.
Yo no pagararia más de 550€,por éste portátil con las prestaciones que tiene.
Y aún y todo es dinero 💰.
Creo que lo de los nits sólo éste modelo”Um 425IA” monta la pantalla de 250 nits y de ésta calidad ,que es precisamente el el que monta el procesador Ryzen 7 4700.
Estas cosas las debería de especificar el
Vendedor.
Tengo entendido que el modelo Ux 425,que montan Intel, la pantalla es de 400 Nits.
En fin,el producto no coincide con lo que compramos. Imágenes de esta reseña
▷ ASUS Zenbook UM425IA-AM006T
Mua ASUS Zenbook UM425IA-AM006T là một khoản đầu tư được đề xuất nếu bạn đang tìm kiếm máy tính xách tay siêu nhẹ với sức mạnh không đáng kể. Nếu đây là trường hợp của bạn, thì chúng tôi khuyên bạn nên tiếp tục đọc bài đánh giá này với các tính năng, ưu và nhược điểm nổi bật nhất của nó.
Đánh giá ASUS Zenbook UM425IA-AM006 AMD Ryzen 7
Kiểm tra, Ưu điểm và Thông số kỹ thuật 90NR02R1-M02550
Chúng tôi bắt đầu bài đánh giá ASUS Zenbook UM425IA-AM006T làm nổi bật công suất cao hơn so với HM038T . Trong máy tính xách tay này, các thông số kỹ thuật cao với bộ xử lý AMD Ryzen7 4700U7 được phát hiện. Đối với RAM, nó cũng tăng gấp đôi từ 8GB lên 16GB RAM, cho phép bạn tải nhanh các chương trình nặng hơn.
. Trong máy tính xách tay này, các thông số kỹ thuật cao với bộ xử lý AMD Ryzen7 4700U7 được phát hiện. Đối với RAM, nó cũng tăng gấp đôi từ 8GB lên 16GB RAM, cho phép bạn tải nhanh các chương trình nặng hơn. Thiết kế của chiếc máy tính xách tay này là một trong những điểm nổi bật được tiết lộ trong bài kiểm tra ASUS Zenbook UM425IA-AM006T. Độ dày của nó chỉ 13.9 mm và trọng lượng chỉ hơn 1.19 kg . Do đó, nó là một chiếc ultrabook rất mạnh mẽ nhưng cũng rất nhẹ.
. Do đó, nó là một chiếc ultrabook rất mạnh mẽ nhưng cũng rất nhẹ. Màn hình ZenBook 14 cung cấp một tỷ lệ màn hình so với thân máy tuyệt vời 90% nhờ các cạnh hẹp . Độ phân giải của nó là Full HD (1920 x 1080P) và chỉ tiêu thụ 1 watt, có khả năng tạo ra độ sáng lên đến 400 nits.
. Độ phân giải của nó là Full HD (1920 x 1080P) và chỉ tiêu thụ 1 watt, có khả năng tạo ra độ sáng lên đến 400 nits. Bàn phím QWERTY của Tây Ban Nha cũng tận dụng tối đa không gian, với khoảng cách giữa các phím tối ưu để gõ thoải mái. Ngoài ra, khi bạn mở nắp máy tính xách tay, bản lề tạo ra một góc nghiêng để viết thuận tiện hơn . Sự tách biệt này cũng đóng vai trò như một cơ chế thông gió hiệu quả.
. Sự tách biệt này cũng đóng vai trò như một cơ chế thông gió hiệu quả. Và nếu bạn làm việc với bảng tính, đừng lo lắng vì bàn di chuột cho phép kích hoạt bàn phím số có đèn LED trên bề mặt của nó.
trên bề mặt của nó. Đối với cuộc gọi điện video, máy tính xách tay này là được trang bị AI có khả năng loại bỏ tiếng ồn xung quanh khó chịu . Điều này đảm bảo rằng bạn nghe và được nghe rõ ràng.
. Điều này đảm bảo rằng bạn nghe và được nghe rõ ràng. Thêm chi tiết. Webcam của bạn có nhận dạng khuôn mặt để đăng nhập an toàn mà không cần mật khẩu. Hệ thống âm thanh chất lượng cao được chứng nhận bởi hãng Harman Kardon danh tiếng. Đã vượt qua Tiêu chuẩn quân sự MIL-STD-810G đảm bảo sức mạnh và độ bền vượt trội.
Nhược điểm
Không khuyến nghị dùng cạc đồ họa đi kèm để chơi các trò chơi điện tử thế hệ tiếp theo.
Bằng cách có quyền lực cao hơn ‘người anh em’ của nó, bạn sẽ phải đầu tư nhiều hơn.
Đánh giá ASUS Zenbook UM425IA-AM006T
Như chúng tôi đã nhận xét vào một dịp khác, chúng tôi những người hâm mộ thực sự của dòng Asus ZenBook bởi vì nó có một tỷ lệ giá cả và chất lượng tuyệt vời.
Dòng máy tính xách tay mới này nó là một trong những người đầu tiên được trang bị AMD Ryzen7 4700U7. Điều này chuyển thành hiệu suất vượt trội, có vẻ ngang ngửa với các bộ vi xử lý AMD thời thượng.
El thiết kế và độ nhẹ của ZenBook là một tính năng nổi bật khác. Nó có độ dày không vượt quá một cm rưỡi, với trọng lượng hầu như không vượt quá một kg.
Những kích thước này theo quan điểm của chúng tôi là đáng ngưỡng mộ, đặc biệt là khi xem xét có pin 4 cell, với thời lượng lên đến 21 giờ. Ngoài ra, máy còn được trang bị hai cổng USB Type C cho phép sạc nhanh.
Mua theo ưu đãi hoặc mã giảm giá ASUS Zenbook UM425IA-AM006T
Chúng tôi khuyên bạn nên đánh giá giao dịch mua của mình nếu bạn đang tìm kiếm một chiếc máy tính xách tay có thiết kế hiệu quả, có khả năng chống chịu, nhẹ và năng lượng để dự phòng để làm việc đa nhiệm.
Ngoài ra, nếu bạn muốn mua ASUS Zenbook UM425IA-AM006T theo chương trình giảm giá (phiếu giảm giá), bạn sẽ tiết kiệm tiền trong một sản phẩm với chất lượng vượt trội.
Cập nhật lần cuối vào ngày 2022-08-15 / Với tư cách là Đơn vị liên kết của Amazon, chúng tôi kiếm thu nhập từ các giao dịch mua được liên kết đáp ứng các yêu cầu hiện hành / Hình ảnh API cho Đơn vị liên kết
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T
Specifications
Pricecompare
Reviews for the Asus ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T
[Análisis] ASUS ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T: Casi PerfectoSource: ES→EN
Positive: Compact size; light weight; powerful processor; nice webcam; great connectivity. Negative: No numeric keypad; no fingerprint reader.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/18/2021
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/18/2021
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T. Ultrabook 14,0″ potente (849 €)
Source: ES→EN
Positive: Good price; beautiful design; powerful hardware.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/09/2021
Source: Ofertaman Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/09/2021
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T. Ultrabook 14,0″ potente (899 €)
Source: ES→EN
Positive: Compact size; light weight; good price; powerful hardware; high mobility.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/17/2021
Source: Ofertaman Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/17/2021
Comment
AMD Vega 7: Integrated graphics adapter of the Ryzen APUs based on the Vega architecture with 7 CUs (= 448 shaders) and a clock speed of up to 1,600 MHz.
Modern games should be playable with these graphics cards at low settings and resolutions. Casual gamers may be happy with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
R7 4700U: A mobile Octa-Core APU with Zen 2 cores clocked at 2 to 4.1 GHz and a Vega graphics adapter with 7 CUs clocked at up to 1600 MHz. Compared to the faster 4800U, the 4700U offers a slightly lower boost clock speed and does not support SMT.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
14.00″:
Above all, this display size is used for subnotebooks, ultrabooks and convertibles. For all three types, this size is quite large. The biggest variety of subnotebooks is represented with this size.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List
1.25 kg:
This weight is typical for big tablets, small subnotebooks, ultrabooks and convertibles with a 10-11 inch display-diagonal.
Asus: ASUSTeK Computer Incorporated, a Taiwanese multinational company, produces motherboards, graphics cards, optical drives, PDAs, computer monitors, notebook computers, servers, networking products, mobile phones, computer cases, computer components, and computer cooling systems. The company’s 2007 revenues reached US$6.9 billion. ASUS also produces components for other manufacturers. The Eee PC initiated the netbook boom in 2008.
In the notebook sector, Asus had a global market share of about 11% from 2014-2016, making it the fourth largest laptop manufacturer. In the smartphone sector, Asus is not among the Top 5 and has only a small market share (as of 2016).
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425 review (UM425IA – AMD Ryzen 7 4700U)
This here is the Asus ZenBook 14 UM425, in its UM425IA configuration based on the AMD Ryzen + Radeon Vega hardware platform.
Right now, this ZenBook is one of the most interesting ultrabooks available for less than 1000 EUR here in Europe (and probably less than $800 in the US when available), and a more affordable and more powerful alternative to the Intel ZenBook 14 UX425 variant. The two lineups share most of their traits, such as the all-metal builds, the competent inputs, the fine IO, the efficient 1W screen options, and the large 67 Wh batteries.
However, the UM425 wins at multi-threaded CPU and graphics performance, runs more efficiently, and costs less, while the Intel UX425 version retains a superior keyboard, Thunderbolt 3 support, and a better base-level display on its side.
Update: More recent updates of this AMD-based ZenBook are available in the meantime. The ZenBok 14 UM425UA is the direct successor with updated Ryzen U hardware, while the ZenBook 14 UM425QA is a beefier model with a redesigned interior and full-power Ryzen hardware, up to a Ryzen 9 5900HX. Finally, the ZenBook 14X UM5401 series takes things even further completely upgrading the internal design and thermal module, and adding 16:10 OLED screen options to the mix.
We’ve gathered all our thoughts and impressions on the ZenBook 14 UM425 down below, with the positives and the quirks, and this article will prove highly useful if you’re shopping for a laptop of its kind in the following months.
Specs as reviewed – Asus ZenBook 14 UM425IA
Asus ZenBook 14 UM425IA Screen 14.0 inch, 1920 x 1080 px, IPS, matte, non-touch
2.5W 250-nits (CEC PA LM140LF-3L03) or 1W 400-nits panel options Processor AMD Renoir Ryzen 7 4700U, 8C/8T Video AMD Radeon Vega 7, 7 CUs, 1.6 GHz Memory up to 16 GB LPDDR4X 3733 MHz (soldered) Storage 1 TB M.2 PCIe x4 SSD (Intel 660p) Connectivity Wireless 6 (Intel AX200), Bluetooth 5.0 Ports 1x USB-A 3.2 gen1, 2x USB-C 3.2 gen 2, HDMI 2.0, microSD card reader, 3.5 mm jack with USB-C adapter Battery 67 Wh, 65W USB-C charger with quick-charging Size 319 mm or 12.5” (w) x 210 mm or 8.21” (d) x 14.3 mm or 0.56” (h) Weight 2.62 lbs (1.19 kg)+ .45 lbs (.21 kg) charger, US version Extras white backlit keyboard, glass NumberPad, HD+IR webcam with Hello, stereo bottom speakers, optional sleeve, available in Pine Grey or Lilac Mist
Asus offer the UM425 series in a couple of configurations, with various amount of RAM (8-32 GB) and storage (up to 2 TB and Intel Optane), two types of AMD Ryzen processors (Ryzen 5 4500U, Ryzen 7 4700U), but also two screen variants, with either a standard 250-nits IPS panel or a more efficient 1W 400-nits option, both with 1000+:1 contrast and nearly 100% sRGB color coverage.
If you’re interested in our other reviews of Asus ZenBook lineups, you can find them listed here, while our extended coverage of the best ultraportable laptops of the moment is available here.
Design and construction
On the outside, the ZenBook 14 UM425 is identical to the UX425 series we’ve already discussed in-depth in a previous article, so I’ll refer you to that for all my thoughts and fine details.
In just a few words, this is an all-metal laptop with a dark-gray color scheme and compact form-factor. It’s also lightweight for a 14-inch device, at just a little over 2.6 lbs, and built fairly well. There’s not much flex in the main chassis or the lid, but I still noticed some creaking sounds when picking this up from the desk.
Much like all the recent ZenBooks, this implements an Ergolift hinge design, which raises the laptop from the desk in order to improve the typing experience and cooling. The hot air is still blown out into the screen’s chin, but the panel itself doesn’t run as hot as on the previous ZenBook 14 models, due to a combination of a limited power-profile and a slightly thicker plastic chin, that takes the brunt of the exhausted heat.
The IO is both a positive and a controversial point of this laptop. On the plus side, the laptop gets two USB-C gen2 ports, one full-size USB-A gen1, HDMI 2.0, and a micro SD card reader, so plenty of full-size connectivity in an era where more and more ultrabooks rely solely on USB-C. The USB-C ports support data, DisplayPort and power delivery, but not Thunderbolt 3, which remains an exclusive of the Intel-based model.
On the negative side, there’s no 3.5 mm jack on this series. For what is worth, Asus offers an USB-C to 3.5 mm adapter in the box, but that’s not a decision I support, and I’d reckon it could be a deal-breaker for some of you. Thoughts?
Finally, as far as how this feels with daily use, I appreciate the spacious arm-rest and its smooth finishing, even if the front lip is a bit sharp for my liking and even if the surfaces show a fair-bit of smudges. The lighter Lilac Mist version of this laptop should conceal those better, but it’s not an option for me, as it gets a silver keyboard. These aside, Asus put grippy-enough feet on this laptop and implemented a screen that can be easily adjusted with a single hand, but only goes back to about 145 degrees on the back, and not all the way flat as on their ExpertBook B9 lineup.
Keyboard and trackpad
I was disappointed when I found out that the UM425 doesn’t get the same keyboard I’ve experienced on the Intel-based UX425.
They are identical in terms of layout and size, with full-size keys, a wider set of keys at the right side, wider arrows, and an extra column of Function keys, with dedicated Home, PgUp, PgDn, and End, but the one on this AMD model is a slightly darker color (which doesn’t matter) and feels mushier with everyday use (which matters greatly).
Don’t get me wrong, this is not a bad typer, but it’s not as reliable, comfortable, or accurate as the keyboard Asus put on the UX425 samples that I’ve tested. It just doesn’t’ stand out the way that does, and feels like a standard ultrabook keyboard.
Part of me still hopes there’s just something wrong with this implementation on this early test-model, and the final retail UM425 models will get the same keyboard from the UX425. Having two different keyboards on the same chassis doesn’t make much sense to me, and I’m waiting for further clarification from Asus on this matter.
Feedback aside, this keyboard is backlit, with white LEDs and three levels of intensity, plus a dedicated indicator for CapsLock. Some light creeps out from beneath the keycaps, but the keys are overall uniformly lit.
Down beneath, centered on the chassis, Asus implemented a spacious glass clickpad with Precision drivers and secondary NumberPad functionality, the same they also put on the ExpertBook series. It’s a smooth, reliable, and sturdy surface, with good gesture support and palm-rejection, and I have nothing to complain about it.
As for biometrics, there’s no finger-sensor on the Zenbook UM425, but you do get an IR camera at the top of the screen, with Windows Hello support.
Screen
Asus offers two screen options for the ZenBook 14 UM425 series. Both are matte non-touch 14-inch IPS panels with FHD resolution, but one is a standard option with roughly 250-nits of max brightness, and the other is this newer generation and more efficient 1W panel with 400-nits of maximum brightness.
Our test unit got the standard panel, but most retail variants ship with the 1W screen instead, which would make the laptop more versatile in brighter light conditions, and positively impact the battery life in a normal room.
That aside, this ZenBook UM425 doesn’t get the Chi Mei panel implemented on the base version of the UX425, but a slightly lower-tier CEC PA panel that Asus also implement on their budget VivoBook S14 series. It’s still fine for an affordable laptop, with almost 100% sRGB color coverage and good contrast, but with more limited viewing angles and maximum brightness, the kind that won’t suffice in brighter environments.
Here’s what we got in our tests, with an X-Rite i1 Display Pro sensor:
Panel HardwareID: CEC PA LM140LF-3L03;
Coverage: 95.5% sRGB, 69.7% Adobe RGB, 72.2% DCI-P3;
Measured gamma: 2.31;
Max brightness in the middle of the screen: 277.50 cd/m2 on power;
Min brightness in the middle of the screen: 17.43 cd/m2 on power;
Contrast at max brightness: 1154:1;
White point: 7600 K;
Black on max brightness: 0.24 cd/m2;
PWM: No.
Our unit came fairly poorly calibrated out of the box, and once calibrated, the maximum brightness drops beneath 250-nits, and less in the panel’s lower part. The panel is uniformly lit and shows little to no light bleeding on a dark background.
However, our tests showcased color uniformity issues in the corners and right side of the panel, something to keep in mind if you plan to use this for occasional photo editing and other color-accurate activities. These issues are random with modern panels, though, and you’ll just have to test for them on your unit. For comparison, the exact same panel turned out accurate and uniform in the VivoBook S14 tested earlier.
Nonetheless, most ZenBook 14 UM425 models ship with the higher-tier 1W 400-nits panel. See the article for more details on both panels offered for most of the ZenBook 14 models.
Hardware and performance
Our test model is a top-specced configuration of the Asus ZenBook 14 UM425IA, with an AMD Ryzen 7 4700U processor and AMD Radeon Vega 7 graphics, 16 GB of LPDDR4x 3200 MHz memory and a mid-level 1 TB Intel 660p PCIe x4 SSD.
Before we proceed, keep in mind that I’ve tested a pre-release sample of the ZenBook 14 UM425IA sent over by Asus, with the software available as of early-August 2020 (BIOS 302, MyAsus 2.2.27.0 app). It performed much as I’d expect from the retail models, but some aspects could change with future software updates.
Spec-wise, this is based on the 2020 AMD Renoir Ryzen U APU. The Ryzen 7 4700U includes an 8C/8T processor, fairly snappy in single-core tasks, and highly competent in multitasking, especially when allowed to run at higher TDP settings in demanding loads. By default, this is a 15W platform, but it can stably run at 25+W in the better products. Not in this ZenBook, though, at least not in sustained loads, as you’ll see down below.
Graphics are handled by the integrated AMD Radeon Vega 7 chip, with 7 Compute Units and frequencies of up to 1.6 GHz. Our configurations also got 16 GB of LPDDR4x 3733 MHz RAM out of the box, in dual-channel, and a mid-level Intel 660p PCIe x4 SSD. In comparison, the Intel-based UX425 models we’ve tested came with a faster Samsung PM981 SSD and offer Intel Optane storage options as well. Nonetheless, the Intel 660p should be fast enough for everyday use and can be upgraded with faster PCIe x4 drives, if that would benefit you.
For that, you need to remove the back panel, hold in place by a couple of visible Torx screws, and two more extra screws hidden behind the rear-rubber feet.
The CPU and memory are soldered on the motherboard and non-upgradable, and inside you’ll notice that most of the internal space is occupied by the battery, leaving for a small motherboard that sent over the SSD right near the CPU plate. I was afraid that heat would easily spread from the CPU to the SSD, but that wasn’t an issue on this laptop, with the SSD only running at excellent mid-40s with games.
As far as the software goes, this gets the standard MyAsus app which allows control over the power profiles, battery and screen settings, updates, etc, while the sound is controlled in AudioWizard.
There are two performance/thermal profiles to choose from:
Dynamic – allows the CPU to run at 15+W, with fans ramping up to 40 dB in demanding loads and games;
Whisper – limits the CPU to 7W, to favor lower fan-noise.
I mostly kept the laptop in Dynamic, it’s a well-balanced profile that keeps the fan hardly audible with light use, and quiet with heavier loads, without sacrificing the performance. The laptop also feels snappy with daily multitasking, video streaming, text-editing, and the likes.
Much like with the Intel-based UX425 models, though, this implementation doesn’t excel in heavier loads, and that’s because Asus went with limited power-settings and a quiet fan profile, as you’ll find in this next section of this review.
We start by testing the CPU’s performance in taxing chores by running the Cinebench R15 benchmark for 15+ times in a loop, with 2-3 seconds delay between each run, on the Dynamic mode.
The AMD Ryzen 7 processor runs at higher clocks and power for the first 1-2 loop, but then gradually drops towards 15W of power, with temperatures in the mid to high-70s Celsius. The fan ramps to about 38-39 dB at head-level in this test, and the laptop returns scores of around 900 points.
Switching over to the Whisper mode limits the CPU at 7+W, with quieter fans and lower scores of around 500-550 points.
We also ran the same test with the laptop unplugged, and surprisingly, in this case, the CPU constantly runs at around 17-18Wand returns slightly higher scores and lower temperatures after 10+ runs than when the laptop is plugged in. This is unusual and not something I can explain.
To put these results in perspective, this ZenBook 14 UM425 outmatches the Intel IceLake-based ZenBook 14 UX425 and 13 UX325 models by a big margin in this test.
And here’s how it fares against a couple of other AMD and Intel ultraportable notebooks.
Sure, the Ryzen platforms are a significant step-up from the Intel 10th gen hardware in this sort of multi-threaded demands, but it’s important to notice that this Ryzen 7 UM425 trails the Ryzen 7 in the ZenBook 14 UM433 by 15-18% in this test, and is also outmatched by the Ryzen 5 4500U in the Lenovo IdeaPad 5, since both allow the CPUs to run at higher power. With the 15W power-cap, the Ryzen 7 APU is bottlenecked in this ZenBook 14 UM425 implementation and only runs at about 80% of its potential in sustained loads. That’s not going to matter with daily use, but it might if you plant to run demanding CPU tasks on this computer. Furthermore, the 15W power-cap also takes a toll on the combined CPU+GPU performance, as you’ll see in a bit.
But first, we verified our findings in the more challenging Cinebench R20 test and the gruesome Prime 95 test.
We also ran our combined CPU+GPU stress tests on this notebook, on the same Dynamic profile.
3DMark stress runs the same test for 20 times in a loop and looks for performance variation and degradation over time, and this unit did not pass it. Luxmark 3.1 fully loads both the CPU and GPU at the same time, and it also shows what we’ve already noticed in our other tests: the CPU package runs at high power for the first minute or two, but also fairly high temperatures, and then drops and stabilizes at around 13-15W, with limited CPU frequencies, but the GPU constantly running at its designed maximum speed of 1.6 GHz.
We then ran the entire suite of tests and benchmarks on the standard Dynamic profile. Here’s what we got.
3DMark 13 – Fire Strike: 2890 (Graphics – 3209, Physics – 11821, Combined – 1004);
2890 (Graphics – 3209, Physics – 11821, Combined – 1004); 3DMark 13 – Night Raid: 11955 (Graphics – 12831, CPU – 8623);
11955 (Graphics – 12831, CPU – 8623); 3DMark 13 – Time Spy: 1064 (Graphics – 940, CPU – 4288);
1064 (Graphics – 940, CPU – 4288); AIDA64 Memory test: Write: 41430 MB/s, Read: 43691 MB/s, Latency: 115.8;
Write: 41430 MB/s, Read: 43691 MB/s, Latency: 115.8; Uniengine Superposition – 1080p Medium: 1994;
1994; Handbrake 1.3.1 (4K to 1080p encode): 32.75 average fps;
32.75 average fps; PassMark: Rating: 4533 (CPU mark: 15279, 3D Graphics Mark: 2551, Disk Mark: 13811);
Rating: 4533 (CPU mark: 15279, 3D Graphics Mark: 2551, Disk Mark: 13811); PCMark 10: 4970 (Essentials – 9095 , Productivity – 7287 , Digital Content Creation – 5029);
4970 (Essentials – 9095 , Productivity – 7287 , Digital Content Creation – 5029); GeekBench 4.4.2 64-bit: Single-Core: 4877, Multi-core: 23426;
Single-Core: 4877, Multi-core: 23426; GeekBench 5.0.1 64-bit: Single-Core: 1120, Multi-core: 5794;
Single-Core: 1120, Multi-core: 5794; CineBench R15 (best run): CPU 1137 cb, CPU Single Core 175 cb;
CPU 1137 cb, CPU Single Core 175 cb; CineBench R20 (best run): CPU 2616 cb, CPU Single Core 455 cb;
CPU 2616 cb, CPU Single Core 455 cb; x264 HD Benchmark 4.0 32-bit: Pass 1 – 197.12 fps, Pass 2 – 59.96 fps;
Pass 1 – 197.12 fps, Pass 2 – 59.96 fps; x265 HD Benchmark 64-bit: 51.37 s.
We also ran some Workstation related loads, on the same Dynamic profile:
Blender 2.82 – BMW Car scene- CPU Compute: 6m 15s (Auto);
6m 15s (Auto); Blender 2.82 – Classroom scene – CPU Compute: 20m 10s (Auto);
20m 10s (Auto); Luxmark 3.1 – Luxball HDR – OpenCL CPUs + GPUs score: — AMD APU not supported.
Once more, these are not bad results for an AMD Ryzen 7 implementation, but the CPU scores are slightly bottlenecked in the heavier tests such as Blender, Handbrake, or 3DMark, where this barely outmatches a 25W implementation of the 6C/6T Ryzen 5 4500U. For comparison, a 25W implementation of the Ryzen 7 4700U APU would score 10-20% better in some of these tests, but that’s not possible in this design, which is set to favor lower noise and thermals over performance.
The 15W power limit impacts more than just the synthetics results, it also takes a 10-20% toll over the performance in real-life taxing work/school applications, or in games.
We ran a couple of DX11, DX12, and Vulkan titles on the Dynamic Best Performance profile and Low/Lowest graphics settings. Here’s what we got:
UM425 – AMD R7 + Vega 7 UX425 – Intel i7 + Iris Pro IdeaPad 5 – AMD R5 + Vega 6 UM433 – Ryzen 7 + MX350 UX434 – Intel i7 + MX250 Bioshock Infinite (DX 11, Low Preset) 66 fps (50 fps – 1% low) 40 fps (22 fps – 1% low) 63 fps (50 fps – 1% low) 97 fps (45 fps – 1% low) 76 fps (39 fps – 1% low) Dota 2 (DX 11, Best Looking Preset) 39 fps (28 fps – 1% low) 34 fps (20 fps – 1% low) – 74 fps (39 fps – 1% low) 47 fps (20 fps – 1% low) Far Cry 5 (DX 11, Low Preset, no AA) 21 fps (17 fps – 1% low) 12 fps (10 fps – 1% low) 21 fps (18 fps – 1% low) 35 fps (32 fps – 1% low) 25 fps (21 fps – 1% low) Middle Earth: Shadow of Mordor (DX 11, Lowest Preset) 45 fps (36 fps – 1% low) 32 fps (22 fps – 1% low) 41 fps (30 fps – 1% low) 65 fps (48 fps – 1% low) 31 fps (18 fps – 1% low) NFS: Most Wanted (DX 11, Lowest Preset) 56 fps (34 fps – 1% low) 42 fps (25 fps – 1% low) – – – Rise of the Tomb Raider (DX 12, Lowest Preset, no AA) 28 fps (22 fps – 1% low) 16 fps (3 fps – 1% low) 33 fps (20 fps – 1% low) 45 fps 39 fps Shadow of Tomb Raider (Vulkan, Lowest Preset, no AA) 27 fps (16 fps – 1% low) 17 fps (12 fps – 1% low) 28 fps (20 fps – 1% low) 40 fps (35 fps – 1% low) 29 fps (25 fps – 1% low) Strange Brigade (Vulkan, Low Preset) 37 fps (32 fps – 1% low) 21 fps (7 fps – 1% low) 33 fps (27 fps – 1% low) 44 fps 35 fps The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt (DX 11, Low Preset, Hairworks Off) 21 fps (14 fps – 1% low) – 21 fps (16 fps – 1% low) 29 fps avg (18 fps – 1% low) 24 fps avg (10 fps – 1% low)
Battlefield V, The Witcher 3, Dota 2, NFS – recorded with MSI Afterburner in game mode;
Bioshock Far Cry 5, Middle Earth, Strange Brigade, Tomb Raider games – recorded with the included Benchmark utilities;
I’ve added a couple of other configurations for comparison, all of them ultraportables available within the same segment and price-range. On top of that, you should also check out this article for an extra look at what the Ryzen 7 + Vega 7 hardware can deliver in superior designs that allow them to run at higher power. TLDR, roughly 5-15% improved framerates between the tested titles.
Even with the power bottleneck that affects both the CPU and GPU, as you can see in these following HWinfo logs, older and simpler titles run alright on this ZenBook 14 UM425 at FHD settings and low graphics settings.
In conclusion, the ZenBook 14 UM425 is a versatile ultrabook and a more competent alternative for the Intel IceLake UX425 versions in demanding loads. However, both the Intel and the AMD models are power-capped in this ZenBook 14 chassis, which favors lower thermals and reduced noise levels over performance, so if you’re looking for the best performing Ryzen 7 ultraportable for video editing, programming or other sorts of taxing chores, this is not the one to get.
Update: You might also be interested in this article for a comparison with the Intel Tiger Lake variants of the ZenBook 14, which are slightly more capable in games, but not as competent in CPU-heavy loads.
Noise, Heat, Connectivity, speakers, and others
Asus went with a basic thermal module here, with a single heatpipe and single fan, the same kind we’ve seen implemented on most of their past ZenBook, VivoBook, and ExpertBook lineups.
Furthermore, the software is also designed to minimize fan-noise. As a result, the fan rests idle most of the time with light daily use, spins at about 35-37 dB with multitasking while plugged in, and ramps up to about 39-40 dB at head-level when running games and other combined CPU+GPU loads.
Internal temperatures are kept at bay, but that’s primarily because the hardware package is power-limited in taxing loads, with the toll in performance mentioned earlier.
As it is, our Zephyrus UM425 sample ran cooly with daily use (and remember that’s with mostly passive cooling), and averagely hot with taxing loads. We measured temperatures in the very low-40s on the keyboard deck and low-50s on the bottom, but also high-40s on the screen’s chin, right next to the exhaust. However, as explained in a previous section, that thicker chin takes most of the exhausting heat and the actual panel doesn’t run as hot as on the ZenBook UX434.
*Daily Use – streaming Netflix in EDGE for 30 minutes, Whisper Mode, fans at 0-35 dB
*Gaming – Dynamic mode – playing Far Cry 5 for 30 minutes, fans at 39-40 dB
For connectivity, there’s latest-gen WiFi 6 with an Intel AX20 module on this laptop. It performed well with our setup and the signal and performance remained strong at 30-feet, with obstacles in between.
Audio is handled by a set of stereo speakers that fire through grills on the underside. The angled shape of the D-Panel allows the sound to bounce off the table without distortions, and I also haven’t noticed any vibrations in the arm-rest at higher volumes.
We couldn’t get the Audio Wizard to work on this sample, and surprisingly, that allowed the speakers to peak at significantly louder volumes than on the UX425, at 76-78 dB at head-level in our tests. The audio quality is still about the average you should expect from this class, fine for movies and music, but not impressive by any means.
The same can be said about the HD camera placed at the top of the screen. It’s fine for occasional calls, but the quality is still washed out.
Battery life
There’s a 67 Wh battery inside the ZenBook UM425, which is larger than what you’d normally get on a 14-inch notebook. With the efficient AMD hardware implementation and screen, this notebook should last for a fair while on a charge. Asus mentions up to 22 hours with the 1 W panel, but we’ve only tested the standard panel version and we’re far from those numbers.
Here’s what we got, with the screen’s brightness set at around 120 nits (~70 brightness).
7.2 W (~9+ h of use) – text editing in Google Drive, Dynamic + Better Battery Mode, screen at 70%, Wi-Fi ON;
– text editing in Google Drive, Dynamic + Better Battery Mode, screen at 70%, Wi-Fi ON; 5.7 W (~12 h of use) – 1080p fullscreen video on Youtube in Edge, Dynamic + Better Battery Mode, screen at 70%, Wi-Fi ON;
– 1080p fullscreen video on Youtube in Edge, Dynamic + Better Battery Mode, screen at 70%, Wi-Fi ON; 5.3 W (~12+ h of use) – Netflix fullscreen in Edge, Dynamic + Better Battery Mode, screen at 70%, Wi-Fi ON;
– Netflix fullscreen in Edge, Dynamic + Better Battery Mode, screen at 70%, Wi-Fi ON; 11 W (~6-7 h of use) – browsing in Edge, Dynamic + Better Performance Mode, screen at 70%, Wi-Fi ON.
That 1W display is supposed to shave off about 1.75W of power use at 150-nits of brightness. Looking forward to testing it as well.
Compared to the Intel IceLake UX425, this Ryzen 7 UM425 ran more efficiently in our tests.
The laptop comes with a compact 65W charger that plugs-in via USB-C. It’s a single-piece design with a compact brick and a long and thick cable, and a full charge takes about 2 hours, but quick-charging allows it to fill-up to 60% in less than an hour.
Price and availability – ZenBook 14 UM425 with AMD
The ZenBook 14 UM425 is listed in stores around the world at the time of this article.
Right now, it starts at a little over 900 EUR in Germany for the i5 model with 16 GB of RAM, 512 GB of storage, and the 1W 400-nits screen, which is about 200 EUR less than the similarly specced ZenBook UX425.
Lower tier configurations start at around 650 EUR in the Netherlands and 800 GBP in the UK, with availability scheduled for August-September. No word on this in the US or Canada for now.
We’ll update when we know more, and in the meantime, follow this link for updated prices and configurations in your region.
Final thoughts- Asus ZenBook 14 UM425 review
This ZenBook 14 UM425 could well be one of the most popular lightweight all-around laptops in these next months.
It’s made well and feels premium, it’s compact and portable, it doesn’t compromise on inputs, IO, or screen quality, it performs well with daily use and occasional gaming, it lasts for a long while on a charge thanks to its large battery, it charges via USB-C, and all these are packed in a fairly affordable package.
Compared to the Intel-based ZenBook 14 UX425, this is roughly 200 EUR cheaper over here in Europe for similar mid-level specs. The UX425 has the Thunderbolt 3 support on its side, a brighter and more uniform base-level display and what looks like a nicer and more reliable keyboard, based on our findings, but it’s also not a match for the UM425 in terms of performance in demanding loads and light gaming, as well as efficiency.
In all fairness, though, both the Intel and AMD models are power-capped in this chassis, which only offers a basic cooling module and is set to favor lower thermals and quiet noise levels over performance. But even so, the limited Ryzen platform ends up significantly outmatching the limited IceLake implementation in taxing chores, while both run snappily and quietly with everyday tasks.
In the end, while the ZenBook 14 UM425 feels like the more versatile choice in this 2020 ZenBook 14 lineup and earns our recommendation, it’s still not the obvious choice for everyone over the Intel-based UX425 model, which remains one of my favorite typers in this niche and offers Thunderbolt 3 as a potential differentiating factor. On top of that, this power-limited implementation of the AMD hardware might push those of you looking for a better performer in this kind of form-factor towards some of the more competent Ryzen 7 U options out there.
Update: More recent updates of this AMD-based ZenBook are available in the meantime. The ZenBok 14 UM425UA is the direct successor with updated Ryzen U hardware, while the ZenBook 14 UM425QA is a beefier model with a redesigned interior and full-power Ryzen hardware, up to a Ryzen 9 5900HX. Finally, the ZenBook 14X UM5401 series takes things even further completely upgrading the internal design and thermal module, and adding 16:10 OLED screen options to the mix.
That wraps up our review of the Asus ZenBook 14 UM425IA, but I’d love to hear your thoughts on it, so please get in touch in the comments section down below.
Disclaimer: Our content is reader-supported. If you buy through some of the links on our site, we may earn a commission. Our content is reader-supported. If you buy through some of the links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
Share this article:
ASUS ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T Precio, opiniones y características
Comparador de portátiles
Recopilamos y clasificamos precios y características de miles de portátiles para ayudarte a encontrar el que mejor se adapta a tus necesidades.
ᐈ ASUS ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T Opiniones y Review » ➋🄌➋➊
¿Qué marca de Portátil estás buscando? Ver resultados
¿Necesitas un ordenador portátil para estudiar o trabajar con una buena relación precio calidad para todas las tareas en 2022? Si has llegado a este artículo has acertado. El ASUS ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T se ha ganado en poco tiempo el reconocimiento de los usuarios considerándose a día de hoy la mejor elección de este año.
Pero, ¿qué hace tan especial a este laptop y lo ha llevado a convertirse en el más vendido en Amazon? Eso te lo desglosamos más abajo, en donde conocerás sus características técnicas, su rendimiento en juegos y nuestra opinión sobre el ASUS ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T.
Review y rendimiento ASUS ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T
Ver Precio
Pasamos a lo que nos interesa, nuestra opinión del rendimiento del ordenador portátil ASUS ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T, el cuál no va a dejar indiferente a nadie, déjame demostrártelo:
Componentes
Vamos directos al grano, el portátil ASUS ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T es una pasada, sin más. Estamos ante un equipo con unos componentes equilibrados y con unas características técnicas muy superiores a la competencia en el mismo rango de precio además de ser ligero y compacto, ¡sin cuello de botella! Asus se ha portado con este laptop.
Su CPU Ryzen 7 4700U es a día de hoy una de las mejores opciones para laptops, perfecto para cualquier tipo de tarea ya que cuenta con 8 núcleos además de una imponente cantidad de ram, 16 GB ni más ni menos.
Pero la cosa no queda aquí, ya que el resto de especificaciones de este equipo no van a dejar indiferente a ningún jugador.
Y es que gracias a este chip gráfico el ASUS ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T es capaz de mover juegos indies y emuladores a una tasa de imágenes increíble. Una alternativa genial para pasar nuestro tiempo libre.
Y eso no es todo el resto de componentes de este ordenador portátil está muy bien equilibrado, evitando cuello de botella y siendo fácilmente actualizable en el futuro. Tenemos RAM ampliables, espacio generoso y un equipo rápido, impresionante y muy silencioso.
En cualquier caso constantemente puedes añadir tu un disco duro SSD gracias a su ranura M2 o por SATA, por lo que si el precio se dispara en la segunda opción no debes preocuparte. Te dejo en este apartado la mejor opción:
¡Oferta! Mejor Calidad-Precio nº 1 Samsung 970 Evo Plus, Unidad de Estado Slido M.2 1000GB NVMe, PCI Express 3.0, Negro Ssd con tecnologa v-nand samsung
Factor de forma 2.5.pulgadas excelente tanto para ordenadores porttiles que fijos
Lectura al azar (4kb, qd32) hasta 600.000.iops y escritura aleatorio (4kb, qd32) hasta 550.000.iops
Interfaz sata 6.gb/s y retrocompatible con sata 3.gbps y sata 1.5.gbps
Velocidad de lectura secuencial hasta 3.500.mb/seg y velocidad de escritura secuencial hasta 3.300.mb/seg
Diseño, pantalla, batería y sistema operativo
Ya conocemos las especificaciones más técnicas de este portátil, y sabemos que es perfecto para ejecutar cualquier tarea, pero existen otros factores que, como jugadores, también nos influyen en el momento de comprar un ordenador portátil barato, bueno y con la mejor relación precio calidad, entre ellas el diseño, la pantalla y la batería.
A nosotros nos ha gustado mucho el diseño de este modelo, ya que en primer lugar es muy pero que muy compacto, pesa poco y la pantalla no tiene bordes. En segundo lugar el teclado súper suave con un tacto muy agradable en el momento de escribir. De hecho esta guía está siendo escrito con este laptop.
Por otro lado el ASUS ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T cuenta con una pantalla de Pantalla de con una resolución FHD, con unos colores vivos y una tasa de respuesta bastante buena. Los negros son muy sólidos por lo que también es perfecto para ver películas en Netflix por ejemplo.
Para cerrar quiero hablarte sobre el Sistema Operativo. En función de la oferta que encontremos este modelo puede incluir sistema operativo o no. En cualquier caso no problem si no lo incluye, sigue estos pasos y lo harás de una forma muy económica:
Compra una key original barata aquí Descarga la ISO de Windows 10 en está página (versión 64 bits) Ejecuta la aplicación e instala la ISO en un USB o Pendrive, tiene que tener al menos 8 GB Con tu nuevo laptop y sin encenderlo inserta el pendrive Pulsa F11 varias veces hasta que salte un menú, en el seleccionamos el Pendrive Instala Windows 10, es sencillo selecciona el idioma y siguiente a todo Cuando te pida la clave introduce la que te han enviado al comprar la key ¡Y listo ya tienes tu PC listo para funcionar con una instalación limpia!
Características y especificaciones técnicas
Marca ASUS Fabricante Asus Series UM425IA-AM006T Dimensiones del producto 21 x 31.9 x 1.43 cm; 1.22 kilogramos Pilas 1 Litio Ion necesaria(s), incluida(s) Número de modelo del producto 90NB0RT1-M02300 Color 14″ | Gris Factor de forma Compacto Tamaño de la pantalla 14 Pulgadas Resolución de pantalla 1920 x 1080 píxeles Resolución máxima 1080p Full HD Píxeles Fabricante del CPU AMD Tipo de CPU Ryzen 7 4700U Velocidad del CPU 2 GHz Número de procesadores 8 Capacidad de la memoria RAM 16 GB Tecnología de la memoria LPDDR4 Tipo de memoria del ordenador DDR4 SDRAM Memoria máxima compatible 16 GB Capacidad del disco duro 512 GB Descripción del disco duro SSD Interfaz del disco duro Solid State Detalles de audio Auriculares Marca de la GPU AMD Descripción de la GPU Dedicada Tipo de memoria gráfica Compartida Interfaz de la GPU Integrado Tipo de conectividad Bluetooth Tipo de conexión inalámbrica 802.11ax Número de puertos USB 3.0 1 Número de puertos HDMI 1 Potencia eléctrica 65 vatios Tipo de disco óptico Sin unidad óptica Plataforma de Hardware PC Sistema operativo Windows 10 Home Pilas incluidas Sí Contenido de energía de la batería de litio 67 Vatios-hora Embalaje de la batería de litio Baterías integradas en el equipo Número de pilas de ion de litio 4 Peso del producto 1.22 kg
Cargador para ASUS ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T
Si lo que andas buscando es un cargador para ASUS ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T al mejor precio te dejamos nuestra selección de mejores cargadores para Asus:
Mejor Calidad-Precio nº 1 65W Cargador Porttil para ASUS F555L F550C F551C F552C F554L F751L X550C X550L X551C X552C X552L X554L X555L K550C K555L AD887020 AD883020 ADP-65DW C ADP-65GD B EXA1208EH PA-1650-78 93 5,5 * 2,5mm EspecificacinEntrada: 100~240V 50/60Hz; Salida: 19V 3.42A 65W MAX (Compatible tambin con 19V 1.75A 33W y 19V 2.37A 45W); Tamao del conector: 5,5 mm x 2,5 mm; El chip interno de alta calidad puede aumentar la eficiencia de carga a ms del 50 %. Contenido del paquete: 1 cargador Asus, 1 cable de alimentacin, 1 manual de usuario.
Compatible conAsus F550C F550CA F550CC F550D F550DP 550ZE F551CA F551C F551 F552CA F552C F552 F554 F554L F554LA F555 F555L F555LA F555UA F555U F751 F751LX F751MD F751S F751Y F751YI F502 F502C F502LA F504AU F504EA F504EM X555 X555Y X555YA X555C X555CA X555D X555DA X555L X555LA X555LB X555U X555UB X502 X502C X502CA X551 X551M X551MA X551MAV X551C X551CA X751 X751M X751MA X751L X751LX X751LAV X751S X751SA X751NA X751N X552 X552E X552EA X552W X552WA X552L X552LA X552LAV X552C X552CL X550 X550L X550LA X550C X550CA X550Z X550ZA X550J X550JX X550JK X455L X455LA X455LD X455LN X455LF X455LJ X455 X401 X401A X401U X450 X450L X450LA X450LB X450LD X450LN X450LNV X450LC X450LAV
Compatible conAsus K40IJ K40IN K42 K50I K50IJ K50L K50LX K50U K50UX K501 K501L K501LX K50IJ K501U K501UX K52 K52F K52FRF K52J K52JB K52N K52JR K52JT K53E K53U K53SV K53SD K53S K53TA K53Z K55L K55LN K550 K550c K550CA K550LA K550LNV K550L K550c-X0337P K551LN K551L K551 K55A K55N K60I K60IJ P50IJ P550CA R752l R752 R752S R752LX R752SA R752M R752MA R554 R554L R554LA R556 R556L R556LA R416 R416SA R416S R50 R50C R50CA R503A R503C R503U R510 R510C R510CA R510LA R512M R512MA R515 R515M R515MA R515L R515LA A52F A53E A53S A54C A55A A550L A555L A55VD A56C A56CA D450 D450C D450CA D550 D550C D550CA D550M D550MA
Compatible conASUS Q500 Q500A Q501 Q501L Q501LA Q502 Q502L Q502LA Q551 Q551L Q551LB Q551LN Q552 Q552U Q552UB Q301 Q301L Q301LA Q400 Q400A TP500 TP500L TP500LA TP500LN TP550LA TP550L TP550 S30 S30L S30LA S40CA S46CA S56C S56CA S300 S300CA S301 S301L S301LA S400 S400C S400CA S500 S500CA S550 S550C S550CA S551; P/N: PA-1650-63, PA-1650-93, PA-1650-78, EXA1208EH, ADP65DW, ADP-65DW C, ADP-65DW B, ADP-65GD, ADP-65GD B, ADP-65GD D, AD887020, AD2087020, AD883020, AD2088020, AD2066020, w15-065n1b
Seguro y estableEl cargador ASUS de 65 W tiene tecnologa de chip IC incorporada, con una variedad de funciones inteligentes, que pueden prevenir sobrecorriente IC, voltaje de error IV, cortocircuito SC y sobrecalentamiento interno IO. Certificado CE / FCC / RoHS, es ms seguro que otros adaptadores. Tenemos un servicio posventa perfecto, garanta de devolucin de dinero de 30 das/garanta sin preocupaciones de 12 meses y servicio al cliente amigable las 24 horas!
🤔 ASUS ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T opiniones finales ¿merece la pena?
El ASUS ZenBook 14 UM425IA-AM006T nos ha sorprendido mucho y además para bien. Antes de hacer esta reseña nos mostrábamos algo escépticos y lo cierto es que, tras probarlo a fondo nos ha encantado este Asus.
Por su pantalla, peso, componentes y características técnicas es una opción perfecta para todos los públicos por su relación calidad-precio.
De cualquier modo te recomendamos que eches un vistazo a las reviews de Asus que hemos hecho en esta página, para que compares y escojas el que más cumpla con tus necesidades.
✅ Lo mejor Componentes de primeras marcas
Componentes de primeras marcas Calidad-Precio imbatible
Calidad-Precio imbatible Pantalla con colores fieles
Pantalla con colores fieles Compacto y ligero
Compacto y ligero Versátil para todo ❌ Lo Peor Se queda un poco corto para algunas tareas
Se queda un poco corto para algunas tareas La batería si le damos mucha caña (juegos) no dura más de 2 horas
¡Aprovecha esta oferta en Amazon!
Rate this post
officialsite
The new ZenBook 14 is slightly thinner and lighter than the previous one and is available in many configurations, both with Intel and AMD processors.
▷ Asus Zenbook 14 UM425IA-AM006
¿Merece la pena comprar el Asus Zenbook 14 UM425IA AM006?
Una de las primeras cosas que tienes que saber del Asus Zenbook 14 UM425IA-AM006 es que es una de las gamas más premium de la marca en ultraligeros, fabricado con un chasis de aluminio y un peso de tan solo 1.22 kg, haciéndolo un portátil ultraligero y que al utilizar bisagra ErgoLift se levanta unos grados el teclado mejorando notablemente la escritura, optimizando la refrigeración y un sonido más envolvente, gracias también a sus altavoces con audio certificado Harman/Kardon que le dan un plus de calidad en el apartado sonoro.
Su pantalla funciona con una resolución Full HD (1920 x 1080) que para ser de 14 pulgadas logra una nitidez excelente que junto al panel IPS de 250 nits de brillo y el 100% de sRGB consigue que la calidad de imagen sea optima para trabajar con programas de diseño gráfico o edición de vídeo, disfrutando de los colores de una manera profesional. Además, en el borde superior central de la pantalla se encuentra la cámara HD con IR que es compatible con Windows Hello (reconocimiento facial), teniendo más seguridad a la hora de iniciar sesión.
La conectividad inalámbrica es de última generación con WiFi 6 y Bluetooth 5.0, obteniendo una conexión a internet optima en cualquier lugar donde nos conectemos y con Bluetooth vinculando dispositivos compatibles sin problemas, quedándose sin puerto RJ-45 como es habitual para no comprometer su grosor, pudiendo comprar un adaptador por USB. En los laterales, están los tres USB 3.2 de primera generación disponibles, dos de ellos de tipo C y uno de tipo A, junto un HDMI 2.0b y un lector de tarjetas micro SD que podremos utilizar para ampliar el almacenamiento.
No podemos olvidar una de las mejores prestaciones del ASUS Zenbook UM425IA-AM006, su batería que tiene una autonomía de hasta 21 horas de duración en uso mixto de trabajo, ocio o reproducción de vídeo, siendo compatible con carga rápida del 60% en 49 minutos, por lo que es uno de los portátiles con mayor autonomía de batería del 2021.
키워드에 대한 정보 asus zenbook 14 um425ia-am006t opiniones
다음은 Bing에서 asus zenbook 14 um425ia-am006t opiniones 주제에 대한 검색 결과입니다. 필요한 경우 더 읽을 수 있습니다.
이 기사는 인터넷의 다양한 출처에서 편집되었습니다. 이 기사가 유용했기를 바랍니다. 이 기사가 유용하다고 생각되면 공유하십시오. 매우 감사합니다!
사람들이 주제에 대해 자주 검색하는 키워드 Đánh giá ASUS ZenBook 14 UM425IA – Thiết kế đẹp, mỏng, nhẹ, cấu hình mạnh, RẤT ĐÁNG TIỀN
- dương dê
- điện thoại
- smartphone
Đánh #giá #ASUS #ZenBook #14 #UM425IA #- #Thiết #kế #đẹp, #mỏng, #nhẹ, #cấu #hình #mạnh, #RẤT #ĐÁNG #TIỀN
YouTube에서 asus zenbook 14 um425ia-am006t opiniones 주제의 다른 동영상 보기
주제에 대한 기사를 시청해 주셔서 감사합니다 Đánh giá ASUS ZenBook 14 UM425IA – Thiết kế đẹp, mỏng, nhẹ, cấu hình mạnh, RẤT ĐÁNG TIỀN | asus zenbook 14 um425ia-am006t opiniones, 이 기사가 유용하다고 생각되면 공유하십시오, 매우 감사합니다.